Talk:Momin Khawaja
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
edit"Trial held in Courtroom No. 37 of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, under Justice Douglas Rutherford, from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. each day. Court is booked until October"--Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 01:37, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
I am removing the phrase " as part of the Canadian government's aim to send a clear message that "Canada is not a safe haven for heinous behaviour" ". Canada's judiciary operates independently of the executive, and it is not appropriate or accurate to ascribe a court's sentencing decision to broader policy objectives of the government of the day. LegalNerd87 (talk) 06:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Big restore
editAfter seeing a report of edit warring I found that there has been long term inappropriate POV insertions and deletions to this article by IPs and new users. I did a restore to the last version before all the disruption. That caught some minor edits by good faith editors to the inappropriate material, but no useful contributions to the restored version that I could find. With the page now semi-protected hopefully it will stay in good shape now. Legacypac (talk) 19:11, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Legacypac: I do not think this page is protected yet. Should we request protection? -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 19:18, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Legacypac: An IP has reverted the restore, definitely requesting PP. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 19:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
PP done now, but given the long term (since at least June 2014) issues by a range of IPs I think it needs to be indef protected. The guy is in prison for life, confirmed by Supreme Court of Canada, so unless he dies I can't see how this article will need to change much. Legacypac (talk) 20:05, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
- Well, lets wait until the protection is over, and if this continues, I will request indef protection. -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 20:08, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
"...military calibre rifles and ammunition..."
editWhat does this even mean? Like, the actual calibre of the rifles (e.g. 5.56 mm, 7.62 mm, .40 Cal., etc.)? If so, why not just list the actual calibre? If not, this is a meaningless smear by the same clowns who ban hunting rifles that look "military". 142.198.135.212 (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2023 (UTC)