Talk:Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York

Untitled

I'm hoping to develop this article more fully. Potential sources include:
Rodney A. Smolla, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law: § 1983, Bivens Actions, and Related Issues
Steven Stein Cushman, MUNICIPAL LIABILITY UNDER § 1983: TOWARD A NEW DEFINITION OF MUNICIPAL POLICYMAKER, 34 B.C. L. Rev. 693 (1993)
Myriam E. Gilles, BREAKING THE CODE OF SILENCE: REDISCOVERING “CUSTOM” IN SECTION 1983 MUNICIPAL LIABILITY, 80 B.U. L. Rev. 17 (2000)
Stuart M. Speiser, Charles F. Krause, Alfred W. Gans, Monique C. M. Leahy Contributing Editor, American Law of Torts, Strict Liability in Tort and Related Remedies; Intentional Torts
Oscar G. Chase , Arlo Monell Chase, MONELL: THE STORY BEHIND THE LANDMARK, 31 Urb. Law. 491 (1999)
City of Canton, Ohio v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378 (1989)
Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)
City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808 (1985)
Anyone have other ideas about sources that might be useful?Monfredo (talk) 06:47, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Monfredo. Peer reviewers: Ahavriliak.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Inline cite

I removed the inline cite after the name of the decision for three reasons: (1) I couldn't figure out how to make that template point to the Cornell LII page for the opinion; (2) I couldn't figure out how to make the template make the whole reference "xxx U.S. yyy" work as a reasonable link -- somehow the first first part (xxx) was not marked as part of a link, the second part (U.S.) inappropriately linked to a page on the U.S. Reports when "U.S." is actually part of the reference, and the third part (yyy) confusingly contained the whole of the link; and (3) I agree with Bryan Garner that such inline cites are unnecessary and irritating for ordinary readers, especially when that information is readily available for technical readers in footnotes as well as in the infobox here on Wikipedia pages. Belastro (talk) 23:19, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

I replaced links to NexisLexis with links to Cornell's LII because the NexisLexis content hides behind a paywall. I don't know if there is an appropriate Wikipedia policy, but I don't think we should refer our readers to pay-for-access sites, particularly when other sources are freely available. Belastro (talk) 23:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Alex's comment

Very impressive!! For more readings about the case and its impact, in addition to using citing references/case notes in commercial databases to find more, you may consider using this list of sources as a starting point available here: http://www1.law.umkc.edu/justicepapers/monelldocs/MonellBibliography01.htm

Hope this helps!

Alex2018ALR (talk) 18:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC) Alex