Talk:Money Can't Buy/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I'll take this, should have this to you within a day or two and will mainly focus on copyediting issues. Thanks, ☠ Jaguar ☠ 21:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

• The lead summarises the article well, so I couldn't find any problems here. One thing I would suggest however is that the second paragraph could expand on what critics thought of the show?

Added

• Can the opening of the Broadcasts and live recording section be expanded? It seems too short that it disrupts flow

That was all the information I could find regarding the concert's broadcast.

• "On 22 November, it was broadcast on ITV1, a television channel in the United Kingdom" - cut to On 22 November, it was broadcast on ITV1, in the United Kingdom

Added

• "In the United States, it was released on 7 September" - on what format? DVD? Television?

It's only available as a DVD. But I mentioned it nonetheless.

• "Commercially, the DVD was successful." - was it successful everywhere? Worldwide or just some countries?

I removed the sentence completely

References

All references are in working order and the citations are in the correct places, so this meets the criteria

Thanks!

On hold

This is a good article; it is well written and comprehensive, very worthy of becoming a GA. The concerns are very minor, so I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days and once those issues are addressed we'll take another look. Regards ☠ Jaguar ☠ 14:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

I hope your concerns are addressed to your satisfaction. Thank you for the review --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Close - promoted

Thanks for addressing them, I think that's it for now. This article meets the criteria, so promoting ☠ Jaguar ☠ 21:27, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 13:44, 30 December 2014 (UTC)