Talk:Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics

Latest comment: 1 year ago by BorgQueen in topic Did you know nomination

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 04:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


Copyvio check

edit

Earwig says good to go.

Files

edit

All images are relevant, good quality and copyright-free:

  • File:Flag of Mongolia.svg: valid public domain rationale;
  • File:Putin attended the opening ceremony of 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics (3).jpg: CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Prose

edit
  • Batmönkhiin Achbadrakh and Enkhtuul Ariunsanaa are both wikilinked a few times. Only their first mentions in the lead and body of the article need to be wikilinked.
  • In the infobox, unlink Batmönkhiin Achbadrakh in Flag bearer (closing).
  • "the nation had sent two cross-country skiers, which were" – change to "who were"
  • "The delegation's best finish in any event was 65th by" – I would include 65th of 95 here for added context to readers.
  • Unlink the second mentions of opening ceremony and closing ceremony in Background.
  • Could Cross-country skiing be expanded upon at all? For instance, possibly how they were selected?
  • I would remove the first table (with the athletes) as unnecessary.

  Done except for "Could Cross-country skiing be expanded upon at all". I think it's fine and doesn't need expansion as the information is consistent with Mongolia at the 2018 Winter Olympics, 2010, and 2006, which are all GA.

Ah, I see!

Refs

edit

All sources used are RS. Passes spotcheck—no concerns with refs 1, 5, 8, 10, 13 or 17.

  • Find better publication names for the refs with urls (like www.olympics.com/).
  • I would remove the location parameter from ref 2 as this is the only such ciation.

  Done I think, although I'm not quite sure what you mean by "Find better publication names"?

Using names instead of URLs, like www.olympics.com > olympics.com or www.fis-ski.com > International Ski Federation etc.
I see what you mean, I'll go do that, do you want me to wikilink them as well?
That is up to the article writer, but you have already wikilinked the refs for the International Olympic Committee, The Independent and Olympic Council of Asia so I would say yes. Also just noticed ref 10 is formatted "International Olympic Committee (IOC)". Using or not using the abbreviation are both acceptable but make them all consistent :)

  Done I think I fixed all the refs.

@LunaEatsTuna: Pinging LunaEatsTuna.

Other

edit

Navs, cats and most other templates good.

  Done MasterMatt12💬📝 23:22, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by BorgQueen (talk08:13, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

    • Reviewed: [[]]

Improved to Good Article status by MasterMatt12 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:01, 3 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Mongolia at the 2022 Winter Olympics, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:   - n
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   @MasterMatt12: Good article but I don't really think that these hooks are interesting. Considering the size of the article, i'm not even sure if this article even has a potential hook. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:10, 6 February 2023 (UTC)Reply