Talk:Monica Niculescu

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Lazy reverters read this

edit

If you want to improve this article then add the missing sections from 2012-2014 rather than just reverting. You may also choose to expand upon them. Just because you guessed (I suppose because good-quality writing is somehow highly suspicious) that the content came from a news article without actually doing Google searches of the specific writing to verify that baseless assumption doesn't mean your revert is adding more to the site than the content. You can also add citations if they're so critical to the sections that are missing them (2010, 2011, 2012). It's ridiculous that an article this out of date is being "protected" from high-quality current content and that "protection" is based on assumptions with no data and complaints (about lack of citations) that apply to almost the entirety of the other content that was not deleted.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on Monica Niculescu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply