Talk:Monmouth Cemetery
![]() | A fact from Monmouth Cemetery appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DYK nominination
editI nominated this for DYK and we have received a list of issues which Ive copied here Victuallers (talk) 17:02, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
1. The cited sources, all online, are formatted in a way which only gives the title and access date for the source, I'd prefer more information, like who's work the sources are, who the authors are, when the sources were created etc. 2. The article claims that the problems with the decaying bodies resurfacing at the previous cemetery were caused "due to the raised height in the churchyard", while the cited source makes it clear that the problems originated in that the cemetery was "raised on a mass of decaying bones several feet", which I interpret as meaning that the problems were caused by too many people being buried at a location over time. 3. The article states: "The site was taken over by the town council in 1960 and is owned and maintained by Monmouthshire Council." I can't find this in the source. And how can the town council take over a site in 1960, when the article also claims that the same land was sold to the council in the 19th century? 4. The 2010 restoration of the chapel doesn't seem to be supported by the cited source. 5. The article makes it sound like the cemetery is permanently closed for new burials, while the source says the council will "review the situation in June". 6. The section called "Facilities" is unreferenced. All in all, these issues should be possible to fix. Manxruler (talk) 00:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- 1. reformatted the sources hopefully now better.
- 2. ?
- 3. not sure where the 1960 came from will have to check
- 4. Deleted the source It was for something else I put in then removed and neglected to change
- 5. Dont know what the outcome was will have to find another source
- 6. Now referenced
Anthony Cope (talk) 21:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Anthony - I think these were all marrginal points and some are interpretation. I'll note these as all fixed by author. I like all the pics. I may offer an alternative hook for DYK that emphasises the Welsh bit. Victuallers (talk) 21:33, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Monmouth Cemetery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001210132/http://www.monmouthshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/2405/monmouth_cemetery_site_map to http://www.monmouthshire.gov.uk/downloads/file/2405/monmouth_cemetery_site_map/
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.monmouthpartnershipforum.org/current-task-groups/monmouth-cemetery-group/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)