Talk:Monongahela Formation

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Zigismon in topic Monongahela Group
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Monongahela Formation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 4 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Feedback from New Page Review process

edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: The wording "Monongahela Group" is not used at al in the reference

Hughesdarren (talk) 09:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

[1] It's used a ouple of times in here. Abyssal (talk) 11:49, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Monongahela Group

edit

@Zigismon, Hughesdarren, and Abyssal: Is Monongahela Group a separate topic, or should it redirect here (like the talk page does)? Certes (talk) 13:31, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The Monongahela Group is a geologic unit of many smaller formations and members. It is host to a number of commercially viable coal seams in western Pennsylvania. The Monongahela Formation is used further west where the unit thins and does not contain near as much coal (if any) Several of the units that make up the Monongahela are over 50 feet thick. https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Geolex/Units/Sewickley_3778.html here is one of dozens of referenced stating that this is in fact a recognized geologic group within Pennsylvania. Zigismon (talk) 15:54, 23 October 2023 (UTC)Reply