Talk:Monopoly: The Card Game

Request from article's original author

Moved from article to here:

• Comment on this page or give feedback by clicking here. Thanks.

End of Game Condition?

The Rules say to a certain money amount. My family plays to an ending time. We keep score on paper. I prefer this to the board game. Each hand is a different strategy.--Purpleslog 22:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

I prefer the paper better than the actual money too. I've never played to a time period though. It might be interesting. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐  00:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Our top score on one hand was something like $10k or $12k...and that would be the game. --Purpleslog 17:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Monopoly card game.jpg

Image:Monopoly card game.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability

@Piotrus: @BOZ: @Guinness323: I'm unconvinced this article is notable. It's yet another Monopoly variant... I could only found a single barely RS ref that I added, a lot of refs are listed here but no more are RS, if you can't find any, I'll AfD this soon. VickKiang (talk) 03:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

I guess there are no objections, so redirect to Monopoly_(game)#Spin-offs? Incidentally, I wonder if Monopoly_Deal should have its own article. It had, but it was redirected by User:Ravenswing not that long ago, and yes, the redirected version did not look notable, either. But I found [1], [2]. Might be enough to warrant restoring and a proper AfD if anyone has doubts? _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:35, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

@Piotrus: Agreed, will redirect. The 2 refs are borderline and the Dicebreaker one is not a review but an opinion piece, but I concur a proper AfD is needed. VickKiang (talk) 06:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)