Talk:Monster Max/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 00:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Lead

1. Looks good!

Gameplay

1. "The rooms consist of blocks that can be re-positioned, and are varied in design, featuring objects concealing other objects and surfaces, televisions, platforms that disappear when landed on, clocks, flashing lights, remote-controlled robots, spikes, conveyor belts, and floorings dominated with electricity that can be turned on and off." - This sentence feels a bit messy. Might be good to just list a few examples; for instance, when I look at 'televisions', I have no idea why that's important to mention. You could also just say "The rooms consist of blocks that can be re-positioned and are varied in design, as well as various obstacles." Of course, tweak as necessary, as that's just my assessment of what's being communicated by that sentence.

I tweaked the sentence... Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:57, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Reception

1. At first glance, I noticed that there are multiple sources in the review table aren't mentioned in the article. I saw that Nintendo Power was condensed to a single point (which is fine), but unless I'm mistaken, some others aren't mentioned. These include Computer and Video Games, HobbyConsolas, Joypad, and Total!.

I noticed that although the CVG, HobbyConsolas, Joypad, and Total! reviews are not directly mentioned in the article, they are condensed into the notes to denote what reviewers felt about aspects of the game. Roberth Martinez (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

1. Official Nintendo Magazine is called Nintendo Magazine System in the prose

I put a mention in the article. Roberth Martinez (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

References and links

1. May be worthwhile to archive some links (like Nintendo Life)

I noticed that the links were archived by Bruxton. Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:47, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

1. Fixed some redirects

@Cukie Gherkin:I got around some of the stuff that needed to be addressed. Roberth Martinez (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Looks good. Passed.