Talk:Mont Vernon, New Hampshire

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mont Vernon, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120511173842/http://amherstnh.gov/emergency-services/emergency-medical-services/ to http://amherstnh.gov/emergency-services/emergency-medical-services/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

"Town histories"?

I changed "according to town histories" to "according to town history". Was "according to town historians" intended?--Pmaxhogan (talk) 23:28, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

While there is only one source linked to the sentence, that source itself refers to numerous earlier sources, many of which could be considered a "town history", so I think "according to town histories" was the correct phrasing. (By the way, given the engaging language of the source, why don't they give the author's name?) --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)