Talk:Monte Testaccio/GA1

GA Review

Hello. I will be doing the Good Article review for this article. Overall, the article is very good, sourced, and easy to understand. The only suggestion I have is that per WP:LEAD, the lead is supposed to summarize the main points of the article. I'd add something about its later uses or tituli picti inscriptions to the lead, as they both are covered in depth in the article. I'll allow seven days to make the improvement. Nikki311 03:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

I didn't want this article to fail for such a small thing, so I've fixed this myself and passed the article. Nikki311 18:59, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out. For some reason, this article fell off my watchlist. Viriditas (talk) 10:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)