Talk:Montgomery, Vermont

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

It is requested that an image or photograph of Montgomery, Vermont be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Vermont may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Removing information regarding flawed health study

Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The Vermont Dept. of Health now admits that the health study was flawed and inaccurate. So I'm removing that section. As a flawed study, it isn't significant enough to merit mention in this article.

http://healthvermont.gov/enviro/asbestos/vagm-healthstudy.aspx — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkwiki (talk • contribs) 11:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Many of the actions taken in history were "wrong" and new ones continue to be. We shouldn't remove it because of that. It upset people for quite some time and the ultimate finding "proves" just the opposite of the accusation and might be raised by any reasonable person reading about asbestos mining that had taken place. It needs to be restored because it answers an important question: Did asbestos mining cause problems in the miner population? Are the tailing remaining today a true threat? Student7 (talk) 21:10, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

I'd agree with leaving this information in. Use good sources and NPOV and it's fine to keep in there. Jessamyn (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Montgomery, Vermont. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150523034651/https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014.html to https://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2014/SUB-EST2014.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic