Talk:Monturaqui

Request

Borrow the image from the German Wikipedia. Solarapex 03:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Monturaqui crater/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 18:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• " The crater was discovered in 1966." - this can be read as that it was first found then, when the body indicates that it was known as early as 1962. Recommend rephrasing this somehow to reflect that. Maybe "identified" instead of "discovered"?

  That's done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• " and further to Argentina runs 100–200 metres (330–660 ft) the crater" - you appear to be missing a word in here

  Recast this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• "The crater has been deemed one of the "most impressive" in the world" - recommend attributing the direct quote

  Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• "In 2017, several Chilean organizations and the community of Peine petitioned the Chilean government to declare the site a historic monument. - This sentence contains what appears to be an incorrect link to a place in Germany

  Delinked. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• In the second paragraph of the impact event section, three straight sentences all start with "The impact ..."; recommend varying the phrasing a bit

  Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• Make sure the indicate the language for all of the non-English sources

  That's done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• I have a script that detects harv and sfn errors installed, and it is flagging that you have defined a source named Buhler1988 in the reflist but that it is not used

  Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

• Image licensing looks fine and the sources seem to be reliable.

Good work, placing on hold. Hog Farm _Talk 19:04, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

@Hog Farm: Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

The crater is the depression at the centre of the image

• ... that Monturaqui crater (pictured) in Chile is threatened by human action? However, it does not count with any legal standing that may protect it, although there are a number of present and potential factors that threaten to damage it

• Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Hayat Bakshi Begum

Improved to Good Article status by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk). Self-nominated at 09:38, 4 July 2021 (UTC).

• Hi Jo-Jo Eumerus, review follows; QPQ carried out; article promoted to GA on 3 July; article is well written and cited inline to reliable sources throughout; I can't access many of the sources but a spotcheck found no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook fact is interesting, mentioned in the article and is cited to a reliable source; AGF that subscription-only source supports the hook; image is OK, maybe a bit wide, and freely licensed. Great article, just one note that you may want to covert one of the reference titles (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) from all caps to title case - Dumelow (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

  Did that. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 11:56, 5 July 2021 (UTC)