This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The text claims that this bridge is the "only inverted Fink truss bridge with just a single support tower in the world," but the citation given doesn't support the claim (it just lists a handful of other inverted Fink truss bridges with some photographs and no accompanying text, as far as I can see), and the claim itself seems incoherent to me. For the bridge to have only one support, surely it should have to be free-standing; this bridge is supported by its central pier and also by its attachments to the two buildings at either end, making a total of three supports. Some sort of solid source that explicitly asserts the "single support, only in the world" business needs to be added to the article, or in the next few days I'm going to remove all of that from the article.-Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 13:10, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply
