Talk:Moondance/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zwerg Nase in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 12:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
I will review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:35, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Just a couple of minor things here:
- Background: In the second paragraph, you speak of him making a third record. Isn't it his second?
- Blowin' Your Mind! was his first, Astral Weeks his second. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Music and lyrics: sense of intense intimacy is not NPOV. It also sounds like a quote. If it is, give it as such.
- I attributed that phrase to the author of the source, Brian Hinton. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Same goes for largely impenetrable.
- Attributed. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Release and reception: End of second paragraph: Is LP in small letters in the source?
- Yes, but it should be allowed under WP:MOS to capitalize them anyway. Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- You should give sources for track listing and personnel. I guess that can be found on the album's booklet?
- Done, @Zwerg Nase: Dan56 (talk) 10:50, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
That's about it. I give the nominator(s) seven days to adress the issues. Good job so far! Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Looks good, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 11:27, 20 September 2015 (UTC)