Talk:Morocco and the World Bank
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 October 2019 and 10 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Muffin110.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Charlie cheuk.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review
editFor the intro part, I would provide some basic historical data, like when Morocco joined the World Bank. Zoé Ricci (talk) 04:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Zoé Ricci
For the IFC part, I would be more specific and provide more detail. For instance, when you talk about the project to build an irrigation plant, I would add which parties are involved (public and private). Zoé Ricci (talk) 04:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Zoé Ricci
For the 2017 projects, why focus on 2017 especially? Other than that, I would rephrase the part on the explanation of the 3 projects as the sentences are a bit dry. Zoé Ricci (talk) 04:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Zoé Ricci
For the CPF part, I would try to give more detail on the project to make it more clear, as right now it is not really clear whether the project is about business, women empowerment, or a resilient future (what do you actually mean by that by the way?). Zoé Ricci (talk) 04:15, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Zoé Ricci
1. The lead is very easy to understand and explains the role of the World Bank. The lead part of the article does reflect the most important part of the relationship between Morocco and the World Bank.
2. There are ample embedded links to other wikipedia articles, there is good use of headings, and each heading has its own specific point to be made. The lead does give more weight to the relationship of the World Bank and Morocco on a macro scale while the others offer more minutia topics.
3. This is a WB article, and wikipedia does not have enough info on the relationship between Morocco and the WB so this is a beneficial article. Nothing really feels off topic with this, everything seems to be hitting the important aspects of the relationship, maybe add more information.
4. The language is very neutral showing no biases. All fact based not really opinion based.
5. All of the sources are from reliable sources and there is more than 6 sources used. Most sources are online sources coming from empirical organizations. Most statements are connected to a source which is why I would say that there can be more info added. No heavily leaning points of view in the article.
6. Maybe add tables, charts, or images?
Dtahbaz (talk) 03:56, 6 December 2019 (UTC)Dtahbaz