Talk:Mortal Folly and Mortal Recoil
Mortal Folly and Mortal Recoil has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 6, 2013. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mortal Folly/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 18:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Ayo, foo', I'm 'bout to take a look @ dis article so get ready 4 da review. --Khanassassin ☪ 18:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Lead
- Perhaps link "Mortal Recoil" in the last paragraph? Everything else is fine, though. --Khanassassin ☪ 18:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Plot
- "interrupted by the Ice King, who gets trying to get Finn and Jake's blessings to date Bubblegum." I think you know what's wrong here, haha. --Khanassassin ☪ 18:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- Whoops. Fixed.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Production
- Everything's cool here, actually. Good work. --Khanassassin ☪ 18:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
Reception
- Although I copy-paste from the the "Mortail Recoil", it's good. Have you considered merging the articles: you would keep the reception section pretty much the same, while making an overall beefier article, and the two episodes are tightly connected anyway. Only a suggestion though, it would make sense. --Khanassassin ☪ 18:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- It's true that the last paragraph is very similar; most reviewers saw the episodes as kind of one. However, the production section might be a little hard to redesign, since each episode was storyboarded by a different team of writers, and so they each talked about their respective episodes in the commentary. If I can't find any more episode-specific reception articles, I may very well have to merge.
References There's one citication eror (ref. #13), but it's cool. Not a part of this section, but an external section would be cool; not mandatory, though. --Khanassassin ☪ 18:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- I think its fixed now.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Fix all of these up, and you shall pass. --Khanassassin ☪ 18:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
- I think I fixed or explained all the issues.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:32, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
- Cool, me gon' pass dis artikel. Passin it yo. --Khanassassin ☪ 14:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mortal Folly / Mortal Recoil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://jessemoynihan.com/?p=1290
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Ref problem
editHi, Gen. Quon, just in case you didn't see there's a problem on the current sixth reference. You duplicated "muto" reference. I almost merged them but then I saw that one is the commentary for "Mortal Folly" and the other for "Mortal Recoil". I would fix it by myself but I don't know which one is you citing in the first two sentences of the second paragraph of "Production". Regards, Gabriel Yuji (talk) 22:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads up! I believed I've fixed it.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mortal Folly / Mortal Recoil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140905040749/http://pwcartoons.frederator.com/post/4941767054/last-minute-programming-change-remember-when-we to http://pwcartoons.frederator.com/post/4941767054
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)