Talk:Mortehoe and Woolacombe railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).

This article lacks references.

Devon Low‑importance

	Devon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Further Information

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The British National Grid ref for the station is 248370 143820 (according to the supporting documentation accompanying the Planning Application). (EdJogg 13:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC))Reply

Coolskittle read this

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

i have removed the captions if that was the problem you had with it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.253.71.162 (talk) 14:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

See MOS:IMAGERELEVANCE: "Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative". Multiple mages of a disused railway bridge, which is not discussed in the text, do not fall into this category, and break up the page layout. Text such as "This bridge is in rather good shape considering it was built in the 1890s", unsupported by any refs, appears to be original research. Finally none of the images ahow the bridge in full context, they all seem to be too close-up to put the bridge in context. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 19:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic