Talk:Morton Berger
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Morton Berger article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis page is biased in favore of pedophiles, someone that digs into this kinda stuff really needs to look deeper into this, they say he was convicted for 20 images collected over 6 years? that doesnt sound true. i got this info from another page: "Morton Berger was earlier awarded a 200 year sentence by the Arizona court because he possessed 1000s of porn images of children in his computer. The court awarded 10 years for each of 20 images he possessed for a total of 200 years punishment. This sentence will be served continuously for a total of 200 years without the possibility of a parole. The Prosecutor originally asked for 340 years." from http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/127985/US_200_year_Porn_Sentence_Stands_in_Supreme_Court i think theyre trying to make this guy look like some victim of injustice. regardless of how hars or lax his sentence might be, the info is wrong. Edited 09:58, 27 March 2007 by user 24.255.236.55
- I have amended it to state that these were specimen charges representing a larger collection. Richard75 15:15, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- The only noteworthy aspect of this case is that the sentencing was particularly harsh. I don't believe the article to be biased. That the sentence delivered to Morton Berger was too extreme is whole point of its public interest.209.29.84.21 04:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Commutation of sentence
editThe governor's power to commute sentence was considered by the Arizona Supreme Court here: http://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/0/OpinionFiles/Supreme/2006/CR-05-0101-55876.PDF In footnote 14 on page 45 they said: "The governor generally has the power to grant pardons or commute sentences. A.R.S. § 31-443 (2002). In this case, however, the statute setting forth the sentence purports to preclude that remedy. A.R.S. § 13-604.01(G) (providing that defendant is not subject to pardon or early release)." Richard75 (talk) 01:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Morton Berger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141101143423/http://www.azfamily.com/news/Examining-Ariz-laws-on-child-porn-through-the-eyes-of-an-offender-141450823.html to http://www.azfamily.com/news/Examining-Ariz-laws-on-child-porn-through-the-eyes-of-an-offender-141450823.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070302084846/http://www.supreme.state.az.us/opin/pdf2006/CR050101PR.pdf to http://www.supreme.state.az.us/opin/pdf2006/CR050101PR.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)