Disputed (Double Indirect Method)

edit

The article says the double reverse method (which appears to be the same elsewhere called double indirect or Ravenna technique) was invented in 1989 and patented by one person for his company; The technique seems to be widely understood to have existed for a long time, and the link provided doesn't seem to back up that the technique was invented in 1989.

I think I can provide more academic/authoritative links from home tomorrow evening, when I have access to my library, but here are artists and schools referring to it predating 1989:

I will aim to add more later. Liastnir (talk) 20:04, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mosaic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mosaic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:22, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disconnected Fragment

edit

On 2020-03-02, Wikipedian @عرين أسد أبو رمان: added a block of text:

the Hall of the Seasons, mosaic floor, busts representing the four seasons are found in the corners 
of the border of the mosaic. Each bust has an elongated face, large almond-shaped eyes and long 
hair bound to the forehead by a ribbon

to the section on robotic manufacturing. It doesn't seem to belong there, but a quick skim through the page doesn't show me where it should be. I'm reluctant to just delete it, BRD notwithstanding; it certainly looks relevant.

Anyone care to opine (or act)?

*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 16:09, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

No idea, but unreferenced, probably copyvio, so just remove it. These are the few articles he was working on. Johnbod (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Mosaic

edit

The irregular pieces of mosaic are called 72.27.187.91 (talk) 14:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Theory Of Mosaic Art

edit

During the ancient times, on the lands of Anatolia, Roman Empire and Persian Empire, people were searching gold on the surfaces of light moving small rivers and waters. The games of light on the water surfaces and the combination of lights and colors on the surfaces, most probably effected the artists and mosaic masters. When we check the surface of slow moving rivers and waters, we can easily see the shapes of mosaic, geometries of light and colors. It is not just becouse of light combinations, but also the game between small stones" (under surface) color reflections with light effects on the surface. This is The Theory Of Mosaic Art declared by Arkın Çalapala, July 1, 2022. 37.154.226.163 (talk) 12:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Opus palladianum, the hidden stepchild

edit

Opus palladianum deserves an art. of its own, but there's a redirect that sends to Mosaic#Terminology and thus hides the actual "red link". All other opus types have either "true blue" or red links. Arminden (talk) 19:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply