Talk:Most valuable player

Deleted. crossfire information

Crossfire was deleted by my part because the page supporting information did not exist, or at least did exist until it was deleted. IF anyone happens to come across crossfire website or suitable reference for this data. please restore deleted information and in CrossFire, a MMO shooter. DarkCorrectioner 22:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkCorrectioner (talk • contribs)

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

---

Most Valuable Player → Most valuable player – Per WP:NCCAPS, this is about a type of award, not a specific one. Compare to Man of the match. This also may be part of a practice of capitalizing initial letters in phrases that form initialisms or acronyms (cf.). I think there's also a case to be made for MVP as the title, which I would also support. BDD (talk) 18:37, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

• Move to MVP because I see the logic in the proposed title but I can't bring myself to support it--it's just too uncommon. MVP would be perfect. Red Slash 16:09, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
  • The term is not widely used in all English-speaking countries. The unabbreviated title does more of a service to all readers and avoids WP:GEOBIAS. —  AjaxSmack  08:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

• Support most valuable player per nom but oppose MVP. MVP may meet the standard for an acronym title set at WP:ACRONYMTITLE (the entries at MVP (disambiguation) are minor and/or derivative) but the acronym is rarely used across a wide swath of the English-speaking world. A general encyclopaedia with a worldwide audience would be better served with the also very common unabbreviated form (like man of the match). —  AjaxSmack  08:38, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

• Support most valuable player. As previously stated, per WP:NCCAPS.--Labattblueboy (talk) 03:04, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2 July 2017

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Most Valuable Player → Most valuable player – Same as previous move request, per WP:NCCAPS as this is a type of award and not a specific award. Lizard (talk) 16:51, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

This is not controversial per WP:RMUM. I have posted a request at WP:RM#Requests to revert undiscussed moves instead. The onus should be on those disputing the above move to use the RM process and propose a move. —  AjaxSmack  20:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 21:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

OPPOSE MVP or Most Valuable Player is a special term/award used in sports articles. As a specific phrase, all three letters should be capitalised. 120.16.209.13 (talk) 07:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Swimming

International Swimming League has a mvp points system that may qualify them to be mentioned on this page. 217.213.110.48 (talk) 13:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)