Talk:Most influential Jews
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Bar-abban in topic [Untitled]
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
[Untitled]
editThis is a disambiguatiuon page. Therefore your speedy criterion is invalid. Just search the phrase in google and you'll see that the page makes sense. Bar-abban (talk) 18:22, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Disambiguation page is used when pages of different subjects and/or topics have a similar name, such as this page or this page. In this case, the pages have different titles, and can be easily differentiated by anyone. Hence, your argument is invalid. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 18:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- These pages may (this is what the policy actually says) have a similar name: "(List of) Most influential Jews", therefore I created this disambig page in the first place. Bar-abban (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- P.S. Your deletion of my tag is a continued pattern of disrespect to other editors, started in my talk page. Your behavior is detrimental to the image of wikipedia and deterrent to new editors. Bar-abban (talk) 18:43, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Disambiguation page is used when pages of different subjects and/or topics have a similar name, such as this page or this page. In this case, the pages have different titles, and can be easily differentiated by anyone. Hence, your argument is invalid. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 18:29, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Both attempts of your 'db' tag state reasons irrelevant to thye page. Bar-abban (talk) 18:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- In any case, this page is becoming nothing other than a linkfarm to other articles. You have not given me a single reason as to why this page can be kept. Also, you have violated WP:AGF. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 19:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry colleague, I don't have to give you any reasons at the moment: your tags are inappropriate, since they do not address article content and purpose. As to your first phrase, please explain what you mean under the word linkfarm. From your tone I understand that linkfarm is bad. If it is so, please explain why. (From direct meaning of the word I guess linkfarm is something with many links, i.e., lists and disambig pages are linkfarms. But there are plenty of them in wikipedia.) Also I did not violate any AGF: I am judging from what you write, not from what I think you think: first you accused me of making test edits, then you deleted my hangon tag without finishing a discussion. If you think this is a respectful behavior, then obviously we have to ask a third person to judge. Bar-abban (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC)