Requesting assistance to restore the 'Contents' section

edit

Dear Grandmaster @BoyTheKingCanDance, thank you very much for reviewing and approving the article. Would you kindly consider allowing the contents section if I provide a few links? Since Sir Sydney Smith was the forensic investigator in each case, we can also link about 5 cases (already in Wikipedia) to this article, because this book is the main text written for the public on those cases. Appreciate your support and thanks for the continuous guidance. Nir007H (talk) 03:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi my friend, Nir007H, buy all mean please insert whatever you think is important as long as it's presented in a neutral way and is well referenced with reliable third-party sources. But don't have the whole table of contents. It would be best to have a "cases" section. Best wishes, BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:35, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you GM @BoyTheKingCanDance. I'll select only the most important ones, and one by one add them and let you know once done. Nir007H (talk) 03:45, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
I completed the task GM @BoyTheKingCanDance. Hope it's ok now. :) Nir007H (talk) 06:22, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply