Talk:Motherboy XXX

Latest comment: 3 years ago by TJMSmith in topic Did you know nomination

Untitled

edit

google "motherboy" and you'll only find AD references. it's not a real band.

Is this a goof?

edit

Why is the presence of a camera operator considered a goof? The camera operators and the cameras themselves clearly exist in the universe of the show. It's another joke, not a goof. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.104.244.6 (talk) 11:07, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg

edit
 

Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:25, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg

edit
 

Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg

edit
 

Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg

edit
 

Image:Arrested Development - Motherboy XXX2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Missing P

edit

George Michael is missing the 'P' in 'Enterprise' on his costume, a reference to the time GOB lost his 'P' on his Segway earlier in Season 2. Note also that the missing 'P' results in a still proper word or words. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.174.206.149 (talk) 18:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TJMSmith (talk15:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment: This is my first dyk nomination. Hope I'm doing it all right.

Converted from a redirect by Microwavedfork (talk). Self-nominated at 02:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC).Reply

References

  1. ^ Giannini, Erin. "The Big Shill: Branding and Niche Programming on American Television". Retrieved 9 March 2021.