Talk:Moto X (2nd generation)

Assembly location still in USA for now

Everyone's new Moto X is arriving with a sticker that says assembled in USA. Looks like the Fort Worth factory is open until at least the end of the year. --Pmsyyz (talk) 19:27, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Moto X (2nd generation) or Moto X (2014)

In most tech sites I am seeing the new Moto X listed as "Moto X (2014)". Would that be a better title for the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoss789 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Response: Although you're correct that most tech sites are calling it Moto X (2014), it looks like Motorola itself and the carriers have standardized on the "2nd gen" terminology for this device. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.139.220 (talk) 14:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

• So how do we handle this, consensus or manufacturer preference?--88.104.132.1 (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Moto X (2nd generation) doesn't use SUPER AMOLED. The Display type of this phone is AMOLED. Nexusfanboy (talk) 10:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Model errors

The current page lists FCC ID IHDT56QA3 as the European/Asian model which is wrong. FCC ID IHDT56QA3 actually supports LTE bands 2/4/5/12/17/25/26/41 based on the FCC OET filings. This targets Sprint and other rural US carriers, but was never released for unknown reasons. It may also be destined for Republic Wireless (Sprint MVNO). The model number for this is allegedly XT1092. Source: http://s4gru.com/index.php?/blog/1/entry-373-teaser-x-marks-the-spot-for-the-first-sprint-ccarrpp-fully-compliant-handset/

US Cellular is using model XT1093 based on a Q&A page for the Moto X (2nd gen.): http://www.uscellular.com/uscellular/cell-phones/showPhoneDetails.jsp?productId=prod2850125 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.139.220 (talk) 13:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

The entire section is an error. It's effectively trivia. I think it should be removed. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

If you mean Section 3 "Variants" then the section is still there, which we assume is now corrected. Right? -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 05:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Moto X (2nd generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141008201949/https://www.motorola.co.uk/motomaker?pid=FLEXR2 to https://www.motorola.co.uk/motomaker?pid=FLEXR2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160311224548/https://www.motorola.com/on/motomaker?pid=FLEXR2 to https://www.motorola.com/on/motomaker?pid=FLEXR2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)