Talk:Motte v Faulkner/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. "Motte v. Faulkner" - OSCOLA standards exclude the full stop. This works with other cases such as "Miller vs. Taylor" further down the page.
2. Miller vs. Taylor should not have "vs" but simply "v". There is no need to de-italicise "v"; again, OSCOLA is against it.
3. Which court issued the injunction and heard the case?
4. Was Miller v Taylor a significant case in its own right, or anything else worth including, or simply a lesser decision that cited Motte?
5. "Lord Chancellor Hardwicke" - "Lord Hardwicke".
6. What is the "Works" case? Ironholds (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Reviewer: Ironholds (talk) 20:14, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

This should cover all of the above. Ottava Rima (talk) 22:22, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

• Additional comment, btw; (1741) should be replaced with [1741]. Ironholds (talk) 22:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Done. I take pride in the fact that so many of the references are titled according to the American standards. Mwah ha ha. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 22:58, 31 October 2009 (UTC)