Talk:Mottram in Longdendale
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cheshire?
editWasn't Mottram "historically" part of Derbyshire, but moved to Cheshire in around 1894?? --Jza84 | Talk 13:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- Don't think so... the ancient parish of Mottram was part of the Hundred of Macclesfield. [1], and appears as part of Ches in the old maps...Perhaps you are thinking of Tintwistle, which was part of the ancient parish and went from Ches to Derbys. in 1974?Lozleader (talk) 17:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
- That's the one. Knew it was somewhere in and around the area. Thanks for that. --Jza84 | Talk 20:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Working up some text
editI have given the article a good shaking today. My initial fears that the article would be difficult due to boundary changes were groundless. Anyone like to join in? --ClemRutter (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Mottram in Longdendale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080109101323/http://www.mjpatch.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/ to http://www.mjpatch.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820071500/http://www.mjpatch.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Suggested_alternatives_Nov_05.htm to http://www.mjpatch.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Suggested_alternatives_Nov_05.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926223731/http://www.tameside.gov.uk/leisure/new/bp_09.htm to http://www.tameside.gov.uk/leisure/new/bp_09.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230162250/http://www.tameside.gov.uk/corpgen2/longhistory.htm to http://www.tameside.gov.uk/corpgen2/longhistory.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070417094757/http://www.longdendale.com/history_mottram.html to http://www.longdendale.com/history_mottram.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mottram in Longdendale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10027536&c_id=10001043 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614155243/http://www.tameside.gov.uk/archives/bibliography.pdf to http://www.tameside.gov.uk/archives/bibliography.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)