Talk:Mount Ōmine
 | A fact from Mount Ōmine appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
sacred sites forbidden to men?
editJust a comment here in the "ban on women" section. Cited article [5] only discusses the history of the site, and nowhere mentions sites that are off-limits to men. Presumably, there is some actual source for this??? 207.159.40.106 17:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
This is correct. The site only outlines the ban on women on Mount Omine but nowhere does it talks about the sites that are off limits to men.
- Yeah, I am still working on getting the references linked correctly. The bit about some sites being off-limits to men is in one of the "External Links" section. I will get that hooked up correctly. MightyAtom 04:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
3/2 vandalism
editsign that say no breast implants? there is a mammarycentric focus thoroughout this article that seems like obvious vandalism... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.172.32.236 (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC).
- Thanks for fixing that! MightyAtom 04:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Renaming
editShould we move this article to Mount Sanjō? This is afterall the official name of the mountain. The current name would still be available as a redirect to the new article name, so readers would still be able to find the mountain under the old article name.imars (talk) 13:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mount Ōmine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928063518/http://www.ata-divisions.org/JLD/times/t2004_su.pdf to http://www.ata-divisions.org/JLD/times/t2004_su.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:10, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Is this really in the Top 100 Mountains?
editWhat is the name of #91 on the top 100 mountain list? I'm seeing two different answers on many English and Japanese websites: Mt. Omine or Mt. Hakkyo. Well, everyone seems to agree that the 1915m summit is the correct one, and the major map sites agree that the 1915 summit is Mt. Hakkyo.
The summit listed on this page is Mt. Sanjo, which is significantly lower than 1915m.
Anyway, there was some discussion about renaming this page to Mt. Sanjo. I don't know if that's a good idea, but if it is renamed, that might also impact what I wrote above.