Talk:Mount Ashland Ski Area

	Sports portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of skiing and snowboarding articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Skiing and SnowboardingWikipedia:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingTemplate:WikiProject Skiing and SnowboardingSkiing and Snowboarding articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Article split

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Support: great idea, two separate subjects sharing common geography. —EncMstr (talk) 02:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
Support: there is plenty of precedent, see, e.g., Mammoth Mountain Ski Area v. Mammoth Mountain, Mount Baker Ski Area v. Mount Baker. hike395 (talk) 05:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

unlikely year or sequence

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The timeline of development says the city requested created a business plan in 2005, which MAA responded to in August 2000. The following items are September 2006, so I think the August date should be 2006 as well; but maybe it's 2005? —EncMstr (talk) 20:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Split

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Other ski areas in Oregon have two articles. One for the mountain with mention of the ski area and another dedicated to the ski area. For example Mount Hood (Mount Hood Meadows etc), Mount Bachelor (Mount Bachelor ski area). --DRoll (talk) 01:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agree: not just Oregon, but other U.S. ski areas have the same split. hike395 (talk) 04:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (February 2018)

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mount Ashland Ski Area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051203090500/http://www.siskiyououtback.com/mainpage.html to http://www.siskiyououtback.com/mainpage.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic