Talk:Mount Hope Bay raids/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Magicpiano in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 04:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- This is awkward: gave significant resistance. Missing word "troops or soldiers" in 2nd para of lede. Delete the comma after "his army" in the 1st sentence of the background section. Add comma after Rhode Island in the next sentence. "Otherwise" been in a standoff? Cannon is both singular and plural. Dwelling house?
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Publisher location for Deane and year of publication for Munro.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Redlink frigates Flora and Pigot Galley.
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I think I've addressed your issues. Thanks for your review! Magic♪piano 04:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)