Talk:Mount Siple

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It has "probably been climbed"

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Yeah, right. It has an "obscure location", "fewer visits", and it's in bloody Antarctica. So what sort of bullshit is this?
I have also "probably climbed" onto the roof of my house, except that I never have.
Varlaam (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

If the roof of your house was also one of the most prominent unclimbed points on earth, then it would be different matter altogether, would it not? The problem is in the proving of a negative. If there are no confirmed reports of a successful climb, then can we just say its unclimbed and leave it at that? The status of whether a peak is unclimbed or not can be difficult to confirm. The "probably climbed" phrase is used in a reliable source as your latest edit has indicated. I am unsure how we could improve on this much other than just deleting any mention of it being unclimbed or not. Or do you suggest simply removing "probably climbed", even if it is sourced?--Racerx11 (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

More accurate height

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

3162 metres ASL according to TANDEM and Antarctic polar data. Viewfinder (talk) 02:04, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic