Talk:Mount Washington, Pittsburgh (neighborhood)
Latest comment: 4 years ago by YoungForever in topic Requested move 1 July 2020
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 1 July 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move pages. (non-admin closure) — YoungForever(talk) 15:44, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
- Mount Washington, Pittsburgh (neighborhood) → Mount Washington, Pittsburgh
- Mount Washington, Pittsburgh (mountain) → Mount Washington (Pittsburgh)
– While the current titles do describe the content of the articles, they are not in accordance with the usual naming conventions. I was rather surprised to find Mount Washington, Pittsburgh is a redlink. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support per nom, this is similar to Lake Mary, California and Lake Mary (California). -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support Hi, I'm the one who split the article originally (see Talk:Mount Washington (Pittsburgh)#Splitting into two articles). I was not aware of any specific guidelines for titles for pages like these at the time when I split the original page. I would be okay with having them renamed to the correct conventions, though. Are the usual naming conventions you mention the ones here? --Hhm8 (talk) 20:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.