Talk:Mozilla Add-ons

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Trewyy in topic Is this page even necessairy?

Not just a website

edit
  Resolved
 – This article is just about the site.

This article should not just be about the website; it should also be about the add-ons themselves. 69.87.203.136 14:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

They're covered in Extension (Mozilla). Jobarts-Talk 21:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Secure?

edit
  Resolved
 – No objection to edit in almost 3 years.

What is a "secure" website? Just because data transferred between the user and the server is encrypted doesn't make the website "secure." I have removed the "secure" description - wikipedia doesn't really need to get into defining whether websites are secure or not. Cameron 17:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Websites that have secured connections are often referred to as 'secure websites', though I agree that isn't strictly accurate. Also, cryptography isn't just about encryption, it's about authentication, too. Most people won't care if someone sees what extensions they're installing, but they do (or should) care if someone can alter software while in transit.
For the purpose of this article, it probably doesn't matter, as anyone who cares can see that the connection is secured themselves. Jobarts-Talk 21:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image

edit

Visual of the site has been updated, and new functionalities have been added, don't know if this was today, but it probably was. 189.32.154.107 (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

It's different again now, as the site was renamed. The article has no screenshot anwyay. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō Contribs. 20:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Is this page even necessairy?

edit

I dont see the page as useful. It should be combined with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Add-on_%28Mozilla%29 page Trewyy (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply