Talk:Mozilla Add-ons
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Mozilla Add-ons page were merged into Add-on (Mozilla) and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Not just a website
editThis article should not just be about the website; it should also be about the add-ons themselves. 69.87.203.136 14:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- They're covered in Extension (Mozilla). Jobarts-Talk 21:36, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Secure?
editWhat is a "secure" website? Just because data transferred between the user and the server is encrypted doesn't make the website "secure." I have removed the "secure" description - wikipedia doesn't really need to get into defining whether websites are secure or not. Cameron 17:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Websites that have secured connections are often referred to as 'secure websites', though I agree that isn't strictly accurate. Also, cryptography isn't just about encryption, it's about authentication, too. Most people won't care if someone sees what extensions they're installing, but they do (or should) care if someone can alter software while in transit.
- For the purpose of this article, it probably doesn't matter, as anyone who cares can see that the connection is secured themselves. Jobarts-Talk 21:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Image
editVisual of the site has been updated, and new functionalities have been added, don't know if this was today, but it probably was. 189.32.154.107 (talk) 19:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- It's different again now, as the site was renamed. The article has no screenshot anwyay. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 20:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Is this page even necessairy?
editI dont see the page as useful. It should be combined with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Add-on_%28Mozilla%29 page Trewyy (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)