Talk:Mr Russia

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Otr500 in topic Article issues

Untitled

edit

This subject merits review. I am new to adding an article but based or relevant articles Von Ivaor Girl in a Coma this subject is also relevant. There are multiple web sources to site and links to add within Wikipedia. Handmademan (talk) 01:45, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Newspaper links added along with notability reference. Handmademan (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mr Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Article issues

edit
A local Chicago Garage Punk band. Can't seem to find any significant coverage. Two references in the article are marked as dead links meaning the article is sourced through "External links". Being BLP related there should be better sources.
Trimmed "External links". There were six entries, three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
  • ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.
  • ELBURDEN: Please note: Disputed links should be excluded by default unless and until there is a consensus to include them. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply