Talk:Mu'awiya II
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 23 November 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
consistent transliteration needed
editcross-posted to Talk:Muawiya, Talk:Muawiyah I, and Talk:Muawiya II
The title of the article for Muawiyah I uses a transliteration that includes a final 'h', while the titles of Muawiya II and the disambiguation page Muawiya do not. I don't know which is more correct, if either, but they should at least be consistent. —Charles P. (Mirv) 18:39, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
Sources
editThe article does cite sources. The problem is that whoever wrote the text did not use the currently favoured method of citation.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violations
editAccording to Copyvio Detector, the article has copyright violations issue. Saff V. (talk) 08:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- What are you claiming that the article is a copyright violation of?
- The link you posted said: "No Violation", "0.0%", "No matches found." Did you mean a different link?-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:53, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Please see previous revision. Also, I corrected the above link. Saff V. (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Have you considered that the site copied its contents from Wikipedia?
- The site you identified has a posting dated 9 February 2013.
- The version of this article on 21 November 2012 is pretty much the same.
- It is fairly obvious which site copied which.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:30, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- This site is unreliable source.Saff V. (talk) 06:50, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Have you considered that the site copied its contents from Wikipedia?
- Please see previous revision. Also, I corrected the above link. Saff V. (talk) 09:16, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- This site copied from Wikipedia.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- Saff, have you tried reading that "unreliable source"? If you go to the bottom of the identical text, you'll find the following notice:
Modified source: http://en..wikipedia.org/wiki/Muawiya.II
. In other words: that website has copied from wikipedia and NOT "wikipedia has copied from that website" - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)- On a second thought, much of the previous content appears to be a fabrication added by an anonymous IP. This IP referred to "sources" like
Al Nasab (890-949) in his History of the Wars
andLewis Joseph in his article "Islamic Historiography during the Ummayyad period 661-750"
, neither of which turned up on Google. So kudos to Saff for removing the unsourced stuff, but BOO! to Saff for using copyvio as a reason and removing the few bits that actually were sourced (including the sources themselves). - HyperGaruda (talk) 09:31, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
- On a second thought, much of the previous content appears to be a fabrication added by an anonymous IP. This IP referred to "sources" like
Dubiously or unsourced content restored
editWell... <sarc>that's just great.</sarc> I've worked my butt off to recreate a well-sourced article with fancy infoboxes, and then this anonymous IP reverts it back to the largely unsourced hoax. Toddy1 and Saff V., what do you say? Should we go back to the sourced version, or are we going to wait and hope for someone to add sources to the current state, even though this story has been practically source-less since 2006? - HyperGaruda (talk) 20:49, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- I do not mind if you revert back to your version, if you make a list here of the various sourcing issues that your version eliminates. That way we have a record that we can point people at if they come back at us.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, I'm putting the problematically sourced content in the following collapse box:
Summary of problematically sourced content from an ealier revision
|
---|
|
- I see that I had overlooked the sourced paragraph about the ghawth, so I'll add that to the sourced version. And if someone is interested in re-adding all of the above, please note down sources according to WP:CITE, i.e. with at least author, title (preferably both original AND translated), page etc. so that others are able to check the sources. - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:44, 4 December 2015 (UTC)