Talk:Mugai ryu
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Infobox
editThe infobox allows for an understanding of everything taught under the curriculum umbrella of Mugairyu, as well as the influences and ancestor schools that created Mugai. To delete it time and time again is just showing a tasteless resolve to either keep the page as a stub or actually go in depth without cluttering the page with too many paragraphs. MugaiJohn (talk) 02:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 21:32, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Reasons for move
editMugai ryu is the English common name for this martial art (61 books for this[1] versus 0 for the macron name[2]). Jappalang (talk) 02:19, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Your move is against the convention established in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts#Japanese-specific_conventions that says:
- For articles that are about a school of martial arts (ryū), capitalize the proper name part and add the suffix -ryū. For example, "Shintō Musō-ryū".
- This topic specific guideline overrides (specializes) the more generic MOS:JP. It does not make any sense to use Google to check ryu vs. ryū for every indivisual koryū case by case as the choice made by any webpage author is more or less arbitrary, i.e., non-macron version is used for easier typing whereas our goal should be accuracy and high quality (which implies consistency IMHO). jni (talk) 09:38, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
Connection to Kuniba Ryu
editAs part of my research into ZNIR Toho Iai, I've come across Comparative Analysis of the Mugai Ryu and Kuniba Ryu Iai.html this article, that talks about Mugai Ryu connection to All Japan Iaido Federation, and about Kuniba Ryu, an offshoot of Mugai Ryu.
While I don't think I am qualified to integrate this information into the article, it is probably a valuable piece of information worth putting at least into the "further reading" section. Urokugaeshi (talk) 09:56, 23 November 2013 (UTC)