Talk:Muhammad Shah of Brunei
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Weird
editRemoved repaste of the article from talk section.
Article given by 112.202.172.133 is obviously cut and pasted from somewhere else ("Bruney?"). Early version included link to a webby page dedicated to a present-day pretender to the throne, but couldn't find this information on that page either. Perhaps a former version of the Brunei history center's page? If someone could check using the Wayback Machine, that'd be great. — LlywelynII 21:26, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
Untitled comment from December 2012
editLegally?
If the Sultanate is only existing constitutionally, then it is not a U.N charter member. Therefore, it is not legally a Country-State.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.210.10.145 (talk) 19:39, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
This page is a mess
editI'm hoping a knowledgeable person can clean it up. If not, I suggest deleting all non-references, duplicate and contradictory information. — SkyLined (talk) 09:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
- I cleaned up the first paragraph. I was unable to do any more because on closer inspection, the rest of the page looks like a bunch of random words to me - their relation to the title of the page is a mystery. — SkyLined (talk) 09:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Overhaul
editI note User:SkyLined above. This page is a mess. I somehow was looking up Brunei for some reason and came to this page and it makes no sense at all. The dates are confused, it's not on topic, and I'm not sure if they aren't confusing multiple people. Much better pages seem to be deleted off Wikipedia. I will make some changes to at least make it readable and quotable, but needs attention from experts. - Master Of Ninja (talk) 16:01, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have cleaned the page up and made it actually readable. The problem with this topic is that a lot of facts are unverifiable unless you look at the original Chinese records. Even the official Brunei genealogy records were only written in the 19th century so there are a lot of unknowns in the life of this person (and probably other persons of that time). There even seems to be debate whether this man was Chinese, or even Buddhist. - Master Of Ninja (talk) 18:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this! — SkyLined (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- I have added additional information and reorganised the structure of the article itself. Hope this gives it a better look and is more readable. Pangalau (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for looking into this! — SkyLined (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Muhammad Shah of Brunei. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151003072346/http://www.bt.com.bn/art-culture/2010/03/08/golden-history-islam-brunei to http://www.bt.com.bn/art-culture/2010/03/08/golden-history-islam-brunei
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120805141750/http://www.pusat-sejarah.gov.bn/sultanbrunei.htm to http://www.pusat-sejarah.gov.bn/sultanbrunei.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101008181632/http://www.history-centre.gov.bn/sultanbrunei.htm to http://www.history-centre.gov.bn/sultanbrunei.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)