Talk:Mujahid Force

Military history: National / Asian / South Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	National militaries task force
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

On 2 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Mujahid Force Regiment. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 8 June 2019

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 22:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mujahid Force Regiment → Mujahid Force – Although the article states this formation is a Pakistan Army regiment, this fact is conspicuously missing from the Pakistan Army's own list of infantry regiments (see the foot of the page). It does however give a brief mention elsewhere (about two thirds of the way down the page) that the Mujahid Force is a paramilitary force. 2A02:C7D:3C1A:7300:6937:120D:E93A:94A5 (talk) 23:14, 8 June 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. Danski454 (talk) 12:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC) --Relisting. — Newslinger talk 04:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2 April 2022

Latest comment: 2 years ago8 comments8 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. There's no concensus to move (closed by non-admin page mover) Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 16:54, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Mujahid Force → Mujahid Force Regiment – This article must be move back to its full name, per references.[1], [2] 103.141.159.74 (talk) 08:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Spekkios (talk) 22:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. BilledMammal (talk) 14:14, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comment. It seems to be referred to interchangeably as the Mujahid Force, Mujahid Force Regiment and Mujahid Regiment. As far as I can see, none is more common than the others. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support per nominator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.119.178.145 (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)Reply
Relisting comment Discussion needed on whether the full name meets WP:CRITERIA. BilledMammal (talk) 14:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Support moving to Mujahid force regiment. 111.119.177.4 (talk) 07:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
The two IPs supporting the move above seem likely to be the same editor. The editor who proposed the move gave a few citations, but did not give any data on which name is more common in reliable secondary sources, and has not followed up after the relisting comment. I would read the current state of the discussion as no case to answer, leading to a "no consensus to move" close, but since no one has actually opposed the move I'll refrain from closing it that way now. Dekimasuよ! 14:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. As Dekimasu says, no case to answer. Nom seems to have no grasp of the issues in terms of WP:AT. There seem to be three possible article names, Mujahid Force Regiment, Mujahid Force and Mujahid Regiment. As none of these three are ambiguous, the current name is trivially more concise than the proposed name and it is hard to see any possible justification for extending it. The two redirects already exist, if either did not not I would just create it. Andrewa (talk) 15:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.