Talk:Mundaneum

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mundaneum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

August 23 to 29, 2015 (21st)

Like Wikipedia?

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could someone please explain why the Mundaneum is more "more appropriately, [like] Wikipedia?" It seems to work more like the WWW than Wikipedia, as this would be something that Otlet's employees work on and set in a fixed definition, not "an encyclopedia that anyone can edit." If it does not fit the definition, it looks like a POV issue. Please tell me if I'm wrong. Loknar (talk)

I agree, this is just a writers personal opinion. --109.34.15.26 (talk) 22:37, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Scientist article from 2008

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

New Scientist published an article about the Mundaneum in 2008 which you can see here. JezGrove (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic