Talk:Municipal Corporations Act 1835

Successor Authorities

What I'm trying to do with the "fate" column is basically specify which authority, if any, excercises the charter functions today. It will usually be a town council; Charter Trustees; or a borough council. (the only one to have been "taken over" by another borough council seems to be the Mayoralty of Pontefract) I'm not sure really of the value of doing it here, but I can't think of a better place to put it, really. Morwen - Talk 18:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Actually it gets a bit complicated: for instance Tewkesbury became part of the bigger Borough of Tewkesbury, but also formed a town council. They seem to have shared out the civic regalia between themselves. I suppose this was all negotiated by the amalgamation committees.

See here for how Llanelli handled it [1]

There were "successor parishes" formed for the areas of many small boroughs: I have a list from a 1974 book, but I have not tracked the S.I. that presumably created them.Lozleader 19:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, interesting. Trying new format.. by the way so careful not to editconflict with me. Morwen - Talk 19:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

And I was thinking of adding a column at the front giving the name of the corporation before reform (they were listed in the schedule to the Act) Lozleader 18:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Ooh, please do! The lord mayor, burgesses, aldermen, elephants and commonality of the Town and Borough of Nowhere! Morwen - Talk 19:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Does the "Successor" field specify the authorities that immediately replaced the ones listed in the Act? If the column lists only their successors in modern times and if there have been other successor authorities in the mean time, this will need to be made more clear. Road Wizard 21:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

It intends to mark their immediate successors. Morwen - Talk 07:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

City of London

The 'old chestnut' of the City somehow remaining unreformed is repeated here. I have clarified this. Tony S79.75.112.254 (talk) 08:14, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Boroughs by prescription

A number of the boroughs are listed in the table as being boroughs by prescription. However, nowhere is this term explained. Skinsmoke (talk) 03:45, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Duly noted... will try and add something... Lozleader (talk) 09:03, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Very speedy! Skinsmoke (talk) 15:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Municipal Corporations Act 1835. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060220130114/http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-046.pdf to http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-046.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:22, 8 February 2018 (UTC)