Talk:Mura people
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Mura from pt.wikipedia. |
untitled
editpoliticalli incorrect terms used!(civilized)
change to urbanized, westernized modernized
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mura people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721062624/http://portal.mj.gov.br/data/Pages/MJA63EBC0EITEMID59BB116C754A4D099C7F3A266E8AAD34PTBRNN.htm to http://portal.mj.gov.br/data/Pages/MJA63EBC0EITEMID59BB116C754A4D099C7F3A266E8AAD34PTBRNN.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
"known for their quiet determination"
edithow is this even quantified, let alone the fact that its left uncited outside of possibly being in the reference dated from 1911 (found in the following sentence's citation)
Cleaning up the Population Figure
editThere are at least two different figures given for the population in this article, neither of which is cited. Both also contradict the population figure given in the article on the Mura Language, which is cited, but is also using a quite old source from 1991. Anyone with access to demographic data, please update this if possible. AnyGuy (talk) 07:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)