Talk:Murder of Bob Chappell
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
“Overly detailed” Tag
editAn “overly detailed” tag was added a few months ago. The way in which thr article is said to be overly encumbered was not identified then, and has not been identified since.
My personal view is that the article displays a relatively clear account of controversial legal proceedings. Understanding the reasons for the steps taken in those proceedings, as well as the reasons for controversy (and also notability) demands a detailed account of the factual background and technical aspects of the case.
In the absence of clarification of why the article is overly detailed, I intend to remove the tag after 28 days. TasmanianCrime (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
The Exoneration Papers: Sue Neill-Fraser
editIn 2023 Wilkinson Publishing published a book by Andrew L. Urban titled "The Exoneration Papers" supporting the case that Sue Neill-Fraser was wrongly convicted. 114.77.87.204 (talk) 18:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)