Talk:Murder of Isabella Nardoni

Improvement of the article

I've just created the article. Further expanding and improvement of it is really wellcome and encouraged. Maybe someone could add more details and sources. In addition, I'm sorry for using mostly Portuguese-language sources, but I didn't find much English-language media coverage on this. The Google News link I provided may help on this issue, however. Victor Lopes (talk) 22:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry about the sources - provided they're credible. However, my main worry is with potential libellous statements. Wikipedia's summary of this is available here and on the related ("see also") pages. I have already changed a couple of sentences into a more neutral tone, and I'll keep an eye on the article - but good work on starting the article! Booglamay (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Glad you appreciated it. Yeah, I think my words may have sounded a bit non-neutral, they might need some changing. But I'll leave this job to someone more experienced on writing in a NPOV. Also, I'm not a native English speaker, so I strongly encourage people to improve the grammar. Victor Lopes (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

One thing the IML and investigation clouded is that they have ACTUALLY confirmed a third person was in there, in the mean time the parents weren't in the room. They hid that long after because they lacked more evidences. So, in fact, they are hiding SOMETHING from public. Who is this third person, however, has not occured to me... Except that, from what I heard, he had an ex-wife. And there is also a possibility someone was hired to do this and then push the blame on them. ~~Anonymous~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.126.66.223 (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Pictures of Isabella

Brazilian press released many pictures of the girl, taken by her relatives. Is it going to be a problem if one of those pictures is used in the article? I don't think that copyright is going to be a problem, but I'm still wondering about it. Crane (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Recent Edit

Hi there, I've just done a little bit of copyediting here. Can the copyediting tag be removed now? What is the normal protocol for this kind of action (I'm a little new to copyediting). Thank you! Mononomic (talk) 03:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

WP:Death Assessment Commentary

The article was assessed as C-class. Although it's a well-written and in-depth article, it lacks sufficient in-line citations for a B-rating.Boneyard90 (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Isabella Nardoni case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080510140005/http://ap.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5iOlf9lAPVvS8Q8gjXCTB6Rzj5kGwD904J5HO0 to http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iOlf9lAPVvS8Q8gjXCTB6Rzj5kGwD904J5HO0
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080510140005/http://ap.google.com:80/article/ALeqM5iOlf9lAPVvS8Q8gjXCTB6Rzj5kGwD904J5HO0 to http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iOlf9lAPVvS8Q8gjXCTB6Rzj5kGwD904J5HO0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:34, 23 January 2016 (UTC)