| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editI worry that this entire page was written by someone who is keen to suggest that the man in jail for murder did not in fact commit the murder. It is a rather biased account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.31.44.4 (talk) 15:54, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
The article has been very well written and reflects the facts expressed on www.Omarbenguit.co.uk There has to be serious doubt regarding the conviction, as it was based solely on the evidence given by a motley group of crack addicts living in the environs of Dorset - one of whom was able to "remember" after more than a year the exact size and details of the knife that was used in the murder, which she testified was possessed by Benguit.
The Italian police had sent Dorset police a telegram warning them of the potential danger of Danilo Restivo who had moved into the local area - and lo and behold at the very spot on the pavement where the victim Oki Shin was found, a fresh clump of human hair was lying next to her body - and so close in fact that it was photographed on the ground by the police within the security tent that had been erected around the body to preserve the crime scene. There is more to this case than meets the eye. Londonlinks (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
The above convo from a year ago raises concerns for me about this page being written to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS. Tulzscha (talk)
Length
editIs this a current style for WP court cases? Restivo's and this one of a semi-related case about Shin, are painstakingly blow-by-blow super long articles full of minutiae and repetitious material compared to more famous trials. If it were a plot section for a film article, someone would have tagged it for shortening, so I have to ask.
Another query is how is this marked as "start class" and "of low importance" given the volume? Thanks. Manytexts (talk) 11:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)