Talk:Murder of Ross Parker/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• No dab links now
• What was his position at the Solstice Pub.
• What type of student was he, high school, college, university ?
• There are one or two place that seems to have problems with [[WP:OVERCITE] - On 26 September 2001 Ali, Awan, and Nazir appeared in court charged with Parker's murder and a fourth person was charged the following day.[18][33][34] Does that sentence need three cites? Same with the four cites in the middle of the murder section. Can any be moved to relevant part of the text. Also three cites in the second paragraph of the arrest and charges section.
• There is a citation reqd tag in the post trial section
• In the references

No 1 needs an access date and the authors name added (Matthew Reville) check all others have the authors details included.

No 3 what make REDRIF.COM a reliable site

Reply - it is part of India Abroad Publications, publisher of the India Abroad newspaper.[1] The India Abroad content is published on Rediff.

No 6 and all others that are similar needs to be rewritten in lower case

No 15 needs and several others need accessdates go through and add them where reqd

No 49 is a bare URL

On hold

Its in pretty good shape. I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:03, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Passed GA Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)