Talk:Murphy Report
This article is written in Hiberno-English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A news item involving Murphy Report was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 26 November 2009. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Murphy Report be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Comment
editTimeline As the State routinely uses "Drip and Delay" tactics with unpalatable stuff like this (where their own culpability and policies are usually a large empty hole around which the report must go), can someone with more knowledge than me set out a timeline? --Muinchille1 (talk) 14:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Here is a first draft. I left out a few details, but put in most of the firsts and reports.Autarch (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)- It fell foul of CSDG12 - this was the orginal source.Autarch (talk) 21:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Pro-cathedral
editI'm replacing - "It was found that some acts of abuse had taken place inside the Pro-Cathedral, which has been the main episcopal seat of the Archbishop of Dublin since 1825." ...because it shows how bad the situation had become.Red Hurley (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Additions
editThe December 2010 Wikileaks cable and a section on chapter 19.Red Hurley (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Cardconnell.jpg
editThe image File:Cardconnell.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:52, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Merge
editThis article seems to cover the same ground as Sexual abuse scandal in Cloyne diocese. Should they not be merged? LeadSongDog come howl! 20:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- The Murphy report is about what happened in Dublin, not Cloyne. 70.31.236.8 (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- They are two separate investigations into two separate dioceses.Autarch (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Murphy Report. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110915180009/http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Further%20portions.pdf/Files/Further%20portions.pdf to http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Further%20portions.pdf/Files/Further%20portions.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Murphy Report. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100117111513/http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Part%201.pdf/Files/Part%201.pdf to http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Part%201.pdf/Files/Part%201.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720012516/http://www.eveningecho.ie/news/ireland/murphy-report-chapter-to-be-published-today-485314.html to http://www.eveningecho.ie/news/ireland/murphy-report-chapter-to-be-published-today-485314.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)