Talk:Murray Gold

Biography assessment rating comment

The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. Article needs to be organized into sections to get past Stub class. Needs infobox, photo, and a coherent order to the material. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 03:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

"Jewish" sentence

Also, rather than get into a revert war over the sentence about being Jewish and names of parents, it would be better to include any biographical data in a biography section at the top of the article. The sentence, when it's here, is misplaced and sticks out from the rest of the article, as if someone wants to make a particular point of the composer's religious or cultural background. Frankly, it doesn't strike me as particularly notable, since there seems to be no discernible connection between his being Jewish and his achievements as the composer of music for Doctor Who and other projects. If the sentence is to exist, it should probably be in the context of other info on his early life, schooling etc., not just stuck in at the end as if to say, "Hey, look! He's Jewish!" Okay, yes, his name tells me that is probably the case. So what? I personally don't much care whether this is mentioned or not, but if so it needs to be done right, not just reverted back and forth without any discussion. Thanks! Karen | Talk | contribs 03:24, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Actually, the track The Daleks on the soundtrack has some Hebrew lyrics, as noted on Doctor Who (soundtrack).--Rambutan (talk) 10:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

I 100% agree with that. It strikes me that if the subject were not purportedly Jewish, and were in fact born into a non-practising 'christian' family, nobody would be proposing that the sentence 'he is Christian' be inserted at the end of the piece.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.65.61 (talk • contribs)

71.190.65.61, I think that you are actually Mr Chuzzlewit. As to your point: it is noteable that he's Jewish since his Judaism entered his music (listen to The Daleks).--Rambutan (talk) 18:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

The most important thing is that the sentence about his religion/ethnicity (being Jewish can be either or both) be cited. If we can find a citation mentioning that the lyrics in "The Daleks" are Hebrew, that would probably be worth noting in the article. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:40, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Davies mentions the "What is happening?" Hebrew chant on the Bad Wolf DVD commentary, if that's any good to you. Angmering 19:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

– This simply has to stop. Mr Gold, like the vast majority of British people, is secular and practises no religion.

Why make a special case for a Jewish man? Are all Wikipedia's entries listed by religious denomination? Not at all. It is simply not relevant, and it is certainly not relevant to this subject.

As to the argument that a "dalek chant' contains a word of hebrew, what of it? He also wrote songs in French and Italian for Vanity Fair. You'd be better off writing that he is a polyglot.

British society does not require its citizens to declare their faith in official documents, nor for its census. Why on earth should Wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mr chuzzlewit (talk • contribs) 20:55, March 19, 2007 (UTC)

It's not a requirement, but if proper attribution can be provided and a consensus of editors deems it relevant to the subject, I'm not sure why it should be excluded. The term "Jewish" may refer to a religion, an ethnicity and/or a culture (see Who is a Jew?). I gather that Mr. Gold is not an adherent of Judaism (the religion), and I don't know whether his ethnic or cultural Jewishness is particularly important to Mr. Gold or his music — however, it could be. It all depends on what reliable sources have said. If the matter of Murray Gold's ethnicity has been discussed in media coverage of his work, then it should probably be included in the article. If not, then there's probably no harm done in leaving it out. So there's the challenge: editors who wish to include mention of Gold's Jewishness in the article need to find a source and cite it; based on the coverage in the source, we can determine whether it's worth mentioning or not. Failing that, it should probably stay out of the article. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

The Hebrew lyrics - as well as his very Jewish name - suggest that he is Jewish. I know people who go to his parents' synagogue, but they obviously aren't a reliable source. I'm sure we could persuade the BBC to post a news story containing confirmation of his religion, if that would be OK.

As to Mr Chuzzlewit's point of "are all Wikipedia entries listed by religion", the answer is yes. See Lists of Jews, List of Christians and Lists of Hindus, for example.--Rambutan (talk) 08:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

I hear what you're saying, Rambutan, but it looks as if the question of whether Murray Gold is Jewish is "contentious", and so can't be included unless we have a citation from a reliable source, per WP:BLP. The Hebrew lyrics and his surname may indeed suggest that he's Jewish (at least by ethnicity), but that's not good enough for Wikipedia's purposes. I don't think that "persuading the BBC" is the right way to think about the matter either, but if the BBC does print a story which mentions Gold's Jewishness then we can revisit the matter. (There was a profile of Gold in Doctor Who Magazine a while back — did it mention his faith or ethnicity? That would also qualify as a reliable source.) —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Murray and I were at Cambridge together, and he is Jewish. He didn't hide his Jewish ethnicity, but I don't think he emphasised it either. He grew up in a very small Jewish community, and as I recall was not especially involved in community affairs from his university days onwards. My suggestion is that if you want to know how he wants to be listed, just write and ask him. He was a very amiable person then, and I'm sure he still is now. The comparison to Christianity is misleading, since Christianity is a religious and not an ethnic category, whereas Jews regard themselves as belonging to first a people, then a religion.

There is a relevance to the music as he mentioned in the commentary for Human Nature that he was not very knowledgeable about hymns due to his "background". It struck me that this was a hint that he didn't have a Christian upbringing or attend a church school, so it's probably fair (in view of the above) to cite a "Jewish background" as opposed to implying an adherence to the Hebrew religion. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Stub / Start class; what it needs

I've added sections and a very basic infobox, but the actual information given is spotty enough that I'm not certain the assessment should be upgraded to Start Class just yet. (Feel free to make the change if the article seems to qualify.) It would be nice to know, for example, whether there are any credits worth listing prior to the 1994 one. Other basic data, such as date of birth and middle name, if any, might be subject to privacy concerns. If there are published interviews to be cited, and which can flesh this out a bit, then I hope someone will undertake this task. Thanks. -- Karen | Talk | contribs 05:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

This needs a tidy up....

This seems like a decent enough page, but the encyclopedic content looks to be somewhat compromised by fan-based trivia and conjecture, which makes for extremely variable reading.

Is there any need, for example, for any of the following:

-the sentence about Gold's Randall and Hopkirk score not appearing on the soundtrack album (why mention this at all, it is simply another television credit)
-the sentence about an unused Blue Peter theme (is this information correct, or indeed relevant)
-the sentence about the controversy among fans towards the 2005 Doctor Who theme (tendentious fan forum gossip, and outdated too)
-the sentence about 'bash boom wallop' (no citation and very odd in the context of a reference piece) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.203.22.99 (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

'Mr Chuzzlewit'

Just in case anybody didn't know who 'Mr Chuzzlewit' is, I believe it may be Mr Gold himself, or an aide.

Murray -> Muzz -> Chuzz -> Chuzzle -> Chuzzlewit

79.73.232.221 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 07:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia does not accept content based on personal beliefs. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 07:56, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Ok then, I KNOW that it is Mr Gold himself, or his little IT gremlin. 79.73.251.255 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 16:21, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Excuse me? If you are assuming that I have anything to do with Murray Gold, then you are very much mistaken. Perhaps your time would be better spent doing other things, not making unfounded accusations about other editors. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 21:15, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

I was not accusing you of anything. I was simply stating that I know that Mr Chuzzlewit is Murray Gold. Perhaps you should message him. Ratsouffle1 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 08:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Well, since you have no proof (verifiable external references), then it is original research, and has no place on Wikipedia. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 08:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2014

The main photo is stretched and squished and looks strange. Any way to fix it? 77.101.174.130 (talk) 13:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Looks perfectly fine to me - and I've checked on an I-pad as well as my PC - suspect the problem may be at your end - does this photo look OK? Arjayay (talk) 14:52, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 Fixed. The image appeared distorted to me as well. This seems to have fixed it. Cheers, LittleMountain5 21:13, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 January 2016

He married to Casualty actor Lee Mead 93.107.18.186 (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Not done Not true Stephenb (Talk) 22:00, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Murray Gold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426170757/http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/whatson/season/?week2 to http://www.bbc.co.uk/proms/2010/whatson/season/?week2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 7 December 2017 (UTC)