Talk:Museo Cabeza de Juárez

Latest comment: 2 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk13:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
Cabeza de Juárez

Created by Tbhotch (talk). Self-nominated at 19:28, 3 July 2022 (UTC).Reply


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 05:55, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The crosses are an exaggeration, to be honest. For example, there is freedom of panorama in Mexico so claiming that "there are multiple copyrights at issue here" without a simple research is plain and simple bad faith. Saying that there is no source for Iztapalapa in the body it's like saying that there is no source for the Louvre that it is in Paris. It is not original research to say where things are. Even Wikipedia:These are not original research exists for this reason. If there is some sort of urgency to verify it, the link listed at the official website space has the full address of the museum. And the pictogram is sourced: "The head inspired the pictogram of the Guelatao metro station of the Mexico City Metro, which is the closest to the museum.[14]" (CC) Tbhotch 17:47, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

And it's even worse because the article does mention that it is in Iztapalapa and it is sourced and the source does mention Iztapalapa: "The selected space was a roundabout along Guelatao Avenue,[a] in Iztapalapa, Mexico City.[3]" I'm going to assume that this was just a pre-review that you mispublished. (CC) Tbhotch 18:00, 9 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Juárez died 150 years ago, he has no personality rights at this point. Even if he did, the violation would rely on those involved in the erection of the monument, not on those taking pictures of it. (CC) Tbhotch 16:14, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
 --TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 18:06, 10 July 2022 (UTC)Reply