Wikipedia

Talk:Museum of Calligraphy

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (February 2018)
Learn more about this page

Advertising?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

The museum in itself may be relevant, but the article reads like a badly written publicity (The calligraphy Museum appeared to be a real pearl among the other Moscow museums; The museum is home to unique calligraphy samples including world-renown masterpieces; Studying these art creations a man reveals the history and continuous development of world writing systems; The museum exposition will excite both children and adults and make a fine addition to school and university curriculum). --RCS (talk) 08:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

If it is badly written I can try to improve the language. Or anyone could help me with this. Concerning publicity: for example, the Natural History Museum in its article in Wiki puts it like: "The museum is home to life and earth science specimens comprising some 70 million items within five main collections: Botany, Entomology, Mineralogy, Palaeontology and Zoology. The museum is a world-renowned centre of research, specialising in taxonomy, identification and conservation. Given the age of the institution, many of the collections have great historical as well as scientific value, such as specimens collected by Darwin. The Natural History Museum Library contains extensive book, journal, manuscript, and artwork collections linked to the work and research of the scientific departments. Access to the library is by appointment only".

If the language is pure I would appreciate it very much if Wiki participants would help me. Olaff-Vik (talk) 08:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I would be thankful to everyone who knows English perfectly and who might help me making the text good. Olaff-Vik (talk) 12:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've made some corrections in the text. Please, suggest if some more corrections are needed or not. Or is the article ok now? Olaff-Vik (talk) 08:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'd say it is better but i still have doubts about the neutrality of the article - i must say that i am not familiar with the subject. Before i or somebody else removes the Npov tag, maybe you should ask somebody from the Portal:visual arts to check the content. --RCS (talk) 09:07, 31 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Further Reading

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Why are these reference here? They just look like general calligraphy books mainly. I would try to add notable news sources about the relevance of this museum. --Clubmarx (talk) 16:32, 1 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ok, why not?:)Olaff-Vik (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
Please, check for the new section. Is the article ok now? Olaff-Vik (talk) 14:47, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

POV

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can I now delete the POV notification at this page? Olaff-Vik (talk) 09:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Museum of Calligraphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:48, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Museum of Calligraphy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Museum_of_Calligraphy&oldid=1208719864"