Talk:Mushaf Ali Mir

Subtle linking

I am well aware of the usefulness of redlinks in some situations, but I have removed the overlinked "crashed" one from this article because it will be confusing even when/if it turns blue. The subtlety will be lost on many readers, imo, who will think "well, I know what a crash is & so can't be bothered clicking on that link". I suggest that if an article does appear then it is linked using the {{main article}} template at the head of the relevant section. Alternatively, someone finds a better way to phrase it so that an in-text link is more obviously intended to direct the reader to a more detailed article.

Right now, I rather think that any such article would be yet another Pakistan-related POV fork but of course that might change. -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sitush (talk • contribs) 18:35, 12 March 2012

And why do you think such article would be Pakistan-related POV fork? --SMS ^Talk 19:25, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Read WP:REDLINK the incident was notable regardless of your personal feelings about what the article will become and removing the redlink was a counter productive effort. I'll revert it back in soon. --lTopGunl (talk) 09:38, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Btw, you also need to see WP:WIKILINK, though it is more useful to add wikilink to a relevant text, wikilink to crash will not be linked to crash article rather to the incident article which is more relevant. That's how it goes all over wikipedia. I've given it some more context as well. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:26, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mushaf Ali Mir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:GcWvZ_tXe5cJ:www.defencejournal.com/2003/mar/remembering.htm+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20050117015113/http://www.defencejournal.com/2003/mar/remembering.htm on http://www.defencejournal.com/2003/mar/remembering.htm
• Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:GcWvZ_tXe5cJ:www.defencejournal.com/2003/mar/remembering.htm+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20050117015113/http://www.defencejournal.com/2003/mar/remembering.htm on http://www.defencejournal.com/2003/mar/remembering.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225095224/http://paffalcons.com/cas/index.php to http://www.paffalcons.com/cas/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:19, 9 February 2018 (UTC)